Media double-standard against Sony has to stop

Posted by darkpower On May - 7 - 2009

Wow, did THIS thing start something or WHAT?

Wow, did THIS thing start something or WHAT?

It’s been a few days since we first heard about the X-Box 360 Japanese catalog in which it mentioned the PS3 more times than Sony’s marketing department does. From saying that the PS3 was inferior in playing multiplatform games to saying that the Arcade SKU was less than the PS3 by a few hundred dollars (you know, until you want to add the propriety hard drive and everything else that comes with the Pro and Elite SKUs, then it a few hundred dollars MORE). Through all of it, we heard one very loud website called PushSquare mention something about how Microsoft is treated in the gaming media as opposed to how Sony has been lately:

“Now we know it’s only marketing, and that’s fine, but here’s our point: the gaming community holds such a double standard towards Sony these days that we’re 101% convinced if Sony had released this pamphlet we’d be sifting through hundreds upon hundreds of: “ZOMG Sony should focus on their own system not the competition, they should shut up, make some games, Sony sucks” comments. You’ve read the ones.

We haven’t come across a single comment suggesting the same about Microsoft’s tactics. Interesting eh?”

Judging from the few articles that have popped up recently alone, coupled with what I’ve seen from the past year or so, there’s so much truth to that statement that it’s scary.

Although you don’t have to go any further than Gameplayer AU that thought that Sony gave “64 million gamers the finger” because Sony recently got the upcoming Ghostbusters game exclusive to the PS3 in PAL territories by becoming its publisher in those regions, even though Microsoft has done this practice since the 360 first dropped in 2005 and not much attention was given to the Ghostbusters game before this move, I’ll bring some other things up. The Gameplayer article is a swore testament to what not only PushSquare was talking about, but what I have been saying for months now. No one called Microsoft out on the GTA4 DLC and how they got that and how they screwed gamers out of the DLC, or the Tomb Raider DLC, or the Fallout 3 DLC, or how they got any of the games they got that were PS3 exclusives to go multiplatform (like FF13 and Tekken 6), thereby screwing PS3 owners by making them wait longer for their version so the 360 can get its version at the same time. No outcry over the many from Microsoft, but although Gameplayer tried to insert a little non-inclusion inclusion about the MS business practice, they bitched about Sony getting the one.

Haven't we've seen enough of THIS image, already? Find something new.

Haven't we've seen enough of THIS image, already? Find something new.

How about another article that popped up, this one from Lazygamer, complaining about PSX Extreme’s excellent article asking where the PS3 hate went to in the mainstream media being linked from Sony’s twitter account? The writer clamored that it was immature of Sony to support such “fanboy drivel”, even though Ben Durka never said anything that he didn’t really feel was true, and we just HAD to hear every little syllable that Aaron Greenberg has said, but we’ll get back to him in a moment. Oh, and by the way, they Lazygamer article that whined about Ben Durka’s story and called the PSX Extreme thing fanboyish? Well, Lazygamer used the old and overused “Sony fanboy” crying baby picture in their article about it. Should tell you something.

Wait...so Sony gets called out for GB yet THIS was praised by G4? Anyone else see the irony?

Wait...so Sony gets called out for GB yet THIS was praised by G4? Anyone else see the irony?

For now, let’s get back to that stuff about Sony getting Ghostbusters, and something that I keep thinking about from E3. I’m sure everyone was shocked when Microsoft showed Final Fantasy 13 coming to their 360 (coupled with the further bending over by the slimeball Wada for Microsoft). However, while everyone was running to yell at the top of their lungs for and against the move in a fanboy drivel across the internets, I’m sure no one shut up long enough to catch something that transpired on G4’s coverage of E3 just a few moments later. As an analysis of the press conference (where, like Greenberg, Don Mattrick was doing the “noun, verb, and Sony” spiel so much that it got sickening), Morgan Webb (who is a Final Fantasy fangirl, by the way. Nothing wrong with that) made the comment of when she saw FF13 being revealed as coming to the 360, she could feel a “tear coming down her eye”. Neither her, Adam Schefler, or any of the analyst hacks they had at that conference ever questioned the moral ethics of how they got that to happen, even though the 50 million dollar price point between MS and Rockstar for the GTA4 DLC still was a huge talking point. There was no calling out Square Enix over their lack of PS3 support so far, no calling out Microsoft on anything they said or how their big announcement of the show was making another game go multiplatform (that is being published by a company that has all sorts of controversies surrounding it lately), nothing coming from them asking any questions other than “how good” it was. In fact, at the end on the Sony conference, Schefler’s co-host was saying something about how Sony lacked the “FF13”-type announcement.

THIS guy really needs to be called out a HELL of a lot more!

THIS guy really needs to be called out a HELL of a lot more!

And what about Aaron Greenberg’s comments? Ken Kutaragi had been arrogant when the PS3 first launched. It was a huge mistake, and yes, Sony paid for it. But we have never heard the END of the hate since them. Now, Greenie hasn’t shut up about how the 360 is so much better, and we have yet to see anyone even DARE to call him out (besides us, of course). Only GamesUltra did so briefly during his whole hemorrhaging at retail stuff. However, the two times Sony had said anything PR-like, like the peddling of add-ons, we hear forever the condemnation of the quote from several people (C-Net, Analoghype, IGN, etc.). Where’s the condemnation of when Microsoft runs their mouths about Sony? You know, people try to label me as a Sony fanboy because I call out Microsoft all the time. But it’s not that I don’t think Sony deserves to be called out sometimes, it’s that I don’t have to because so many run this type of bullshit to the ground. Greenie is called a maverick while Kaz is the devil, apparently.

So does THIS teethy douchebag!

So does THIS teethy douchebag!

Where am I going with this? Simple: PushSquare was a hundred-percent correct. Microsoft gets a free pass when they pull moves that make people wonder about their business tactics, but when Sony does the EXACT SAME THINGS, we never hear the end of them from the media as they call everyone out. This is all while THEY get free passes from some of the fanboys on N4G (360-fanboy-approved stories FTW, apparently), while anything calling Microsoft out or saying anything good about Sony is called a “fanboy blog” (or a “SDF approved blog” even though the SDF was made by a Wii fanboy who continues to deny that he made it when evidence that he did is all OVER the damn internets) before getting several reports and fail the next day (though a 360 fanboy approved garbage story will have hundreds of reports and still be on the front page).

There is something wrong with this picture. Sony fans aren’t even asking for people to suddenly turn the other way and never call out Sony. They are just looking for fairness and to have the media to either call out Microsoft the same way they do with Sony (and no, the RROD stuff in 08 doesn’t count), or to back off of them. Seriously, if Microsoft is allowed to get away with several of their business ethics, Sony should be allowed to get away with a few. I know that sounds fanboyish of me, but that’s what several GAMERS who own the 360 and/or PS3 are clamoring for. Fair and balanced coverage of the gaming news, and not the Fox Noise type of fair and balanced coverage. If they don’t want to do that, then they should get the hell out of the industry and make room for someone who WANTS to do the job right have their chance.

Oh, and by the way, PushSquare came out with the catalog story first, NOT Kotaku, and Kotaku never questioned the ethics or the media reaction to it or anything else in this console war like PushSquare did. On N4G, the PushSquare article got onto the hot stories frontbar, while Kotaku’s version got only 40 degrees (10 shy of making it onto the front page instead of just the section page). The PS version got a lot more comments about it (and a few alternate sources that actually condemned MS for it (including our reporting of it) than the Kotaku one did (which had no Alternate Sources until I added the four from the PushSquare one), yet the PushSquare one was failed as being the duplicate story by one of the N4G mods. The Kotaku one never did get to the front page. Way to try to bury THAT story, too, N4G.

It just further shows how right this point is.

  • Share/Bookmark
Adsense Code
  • @tordavis: First, that should've been Adam Sessler. My bad.

    You are right in that Namco didn't formally announce Tekken 6 as a PS3 exclusive. However, at the same time, look at how long it was delayed. Why was it delayed so long for the PS3 BEFORE the 360 version was announced, especially when the arcade version ran on PS3 processors? I would hope that they had real issues and not just delaying the PS3 version until they knew how to get a 360 version working so they could release the two version simultaneously.

    MS and SE has a "great relationship"? Maybe, but look how many claims SE has made. They were going on and on about FF13 being a PS3 exclusive before turning around and giving MS the game. Not to mention that TLR has yet to appear on the PS3, with SE doing the silent treatment towards questions about it. Multiplatform without a PS3 game out yet? Hopefully this changes, but so many people have been saying that it's not that SE is giving the 360 any games that get them, but rather them saying one thing then doing another.

    The Fallout 3 deal I've already talked about in a special comment concerning it. the TR thing doesn't bother me any (besides the fact that Eidos removed a level from the disc to use as that DLC, which deserves its OWN story), and the basis of what the whole GTA4 thing has been so skewed and so debated that I don't think I could add anything else.

    My main issue with this story is not any of those, though. It's how the media perceives it. Imagine for a moment that it was Sony pulling all these stunts, and getting the exclusive DLCs. Of course we would hear the fanboys bitch, but what about the media. We would never hear the end of idiots like Kotaku and Gamedaily and Analoghype saying how "evil" Sony is for robbing people of game content or whatever (hell, how many in the media are STILL begging for Kojima to release MGS4 on the 360? The 360 has MGS:Rising, but not MGS4, which the rumors kept going to). MS never gets called on any of it (besides the RROD). We never heard even a QUESTION of how MS got some of this stuff, because we know there's a ton of questions about the morality of it, and developers have not been too afraid to say something about MS giving money out for these things (hell, we KNOW about the 50 mil given to Rockstar for the two DLC episodes).

    Thing is, I believe that it puts a black eye on the 360 that MS buys these things (sorry, but that aforementioned 50 mil makes a lot of people wonder how they get everything else). It makes the 360 look as if it can't stand on its own merits towards developers, and I know there are things that MS can tell devs about the 360 (easier platform to make games on, a superior (at least for now) online service, bigger install base, etc.) that would make devs want to make games on the 360. Hell, the biggest fanboys to any system is the companies that make them. But using money as way of saying "keep this off the other system" to people that really don't need the money to make the games doesn't really help that image. Nintendo has a unique controller and a way of reeling in a new demographic of gamers (and a pretty solid game lineup with the likes of Metroid: Other M and Dead Space Extraction coming out), and Sony has its PSN that has grown VERY quickly and hardware that, when used right, can make games look sexy. MS needs to have the 360 stand on something that the other systems don't have, and right now, the only thing that gamers see them making the 360 stand on is money ("they have a key demographic, they have the best specs, but we have a zillion dollars to give away to you"). Sorry, but that's the perception, and only Microsoft is able to kill it.

    And Don Mattrick has that douchebag look to him. Look at that grin of his. It seems as though he KNOWS he's a douchebag and proud of it. I guess you have to be a douchebag to make it in the gaming industry.
  • tordavis
    You got some things wrong here buddy. Tekken 6 was never PS3 exclusive. I don't remember any ad campaign stating so. I also wrote an article a year before this was announced stating it could possibly head to the 360 and why. Yes, it was only announced on PS3 but they never said exclusive.

    Microsoft didn't have to pay Square any money to get FFXIII. They have a great relationship.

    Fallout 3 DLC wasn't released for PS3 in the beginning because of Bethesda, not Microsoft. Tomb Raider and GTAIV DLC was made because Microsoft requested it. If not for them asking for it to be made, it may have never been made. So no one is screwing PS3 owners out of DLC.

    Gripes...Who's Adam Shefler? Why is there music playing when I come to this site?

    Oh and calling industry people names like 'douche bag' doesn't get you any kinda of credibility, it just makes you look like a child. Step up your game and leave the name calling to the fanboys.
  • i read this and it is so good and i agree with you!
  • mboojigga
    Oh by the way, this a buisness. Nothing new is going on. It simply seems all it took was one generation for some of you to complain how things are today then what they were when the PS2 was on top. The landscape is simply different. Sony didn't learn from their competitors and everyone that predicted the climate after the PS3 dropped for today are either shocked ,pissed, or suprised by the outcome with where the current PS3 situation is at. Bottom line is they fuc*ed up and are trying to gain ground. Doesn't matter how much you point out what MS has said when we all know how arrogant the comments were before both systems were even released.

    "Next Gen starts when we say it does"

    Come on now.
  • mboojigga
    Not that I really care because I am in the states and I own both a PS3 and 360, but the difference with Ghostbusters as a timed exclusive is becuase it is one da*n month away from release. Fallout 3, GTA IV were announced way ahead of time for anyone CARING about DLC to decide which version they want to get. Sony has also stated they DON'T buy exclusives either.

    As for N4G, why the bitching about what they decided to do with THEIR website. Guess what regardless of what used to be and what is today, um don't USE it anymore. Don't rely on them anymore. Do what other blogs have done before N4G was even around. Some of you bloggers act like life is difficult without N4G. Move on.
  • hi friend i look this site and i think your idea is great!
blog comments powered by Disqus